Kari Lake lawsuit to expose sabotage of election?. Election official who chose ballot paper 100 gauge?, Poor print quality caused machines to reject thousands of ballots
Kari Lake lawsuit to expose sabotage of election?. Election official who chose ballot paper 100 gauge?, Poor print quality caused machines to reject thousands of ballots
Kari Lake lawsuit to expose sabotage of election?. Election official who chose ballot paper 100 gauge?, Poor print quality caused machines to reject thousands of ballots
Will the Kari Lake lawsuit expose who sabotaged the election?
Is she referring to the printer problem caused by using the wrong gauge of paper?
Who chose 100 gauge paper?
Mark Finchem in his lawsuit accuses Katie Hobbs.
Another reason Hobbs is a fool for not recusing herself from her duties as Chief Election Officer.
From Mark Finchem v Katie Hobbs
“72. Secretary Hobbs’ negligent or intentional failure to closely monitor the.certification and re-certification of the certification laboratories and the re-certification of the electronic tabulation system resulted in the chaotic performance of those machines during the midterm election. Had they been propery vetted and inspected the machines would have run properly.
73. Such validation was essential since Hobbs approved a new voting process that allowed voters to cast ballots at any location. This new scheme was applied universally across the entire State, not incrementally. Its failure directly caused the chaos in the election.
74. Any testing by the Secretary of State was obviously inadequate and should have been effected by a lab certified for such analysis. This has been proven to have been an essential step circumvented by the Secretary of State.
The Secretary changed the gauge of paper lined across the state. Before making such a substantial change a certified lab should have tested and certified a material procedural change before the paper substitution.
76. There changes had a vast effect on the publics’ voting experience and amount to material misconduct.”
Had the lawsuit gone to trial, we would have gotten an answer.
Biased and/or incompetent Judge Julian did not rule on the above and dismissed the lawsuit.
